Subscribe to the RSS Newsfeed

Subscribe to our RSS Newsfeed

Political Blogs, News & Views

Documenting America’s political direction with balanced perspective

Search PBNV.com

Who Should be Obama’s Secretary of Defense

Posted by Matthew Avitabile

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our free RSS newsfeed. Thank you for visiting!

There’s been a lot of talk about who Barack Obama will choose to become his next Secretary of State. It may be a good idea for him to concentrate on his Secretary of Defense, too. Obama has talked about bipartisanship a great deal during the campaign, so this is his chance to demonstrate it.

Robert Gates has been a non-partisan, steady hand at the Pentagon since the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld. He has overseen the surge strategy that is decimating al Qaeda in Iraq and has been a very pragmatic secretary.

There are other candidates for the job, to be sure. However, it is up to Obama to blend both competency and bipartisanship. If Gates or someone similar is not named, then Obama’s campaign promises are nil.

also posted at: http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2008/11/who-should-be-obamas-secretary-of.html

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Kurdistan is a Model for Iraq”

Posted by Matthew Avitabile

In today’s Wall Street Journal, there is an op-ed by the President of the Kurdish region of Iraq, Massoud Barzani. Barzani explains how the Kurds and the United States have built a very strong relationship, despite all of the problems of Iraq. This includes:

Last year, following a U.S. request, we deployed Kurdish troops to Baghdad. These troops played a decisive role in the success of the surge.

Barzani also played down anti-Kurdish messages, such as that the Kurds were stonewalling progress. In fact, Barzani shows that the Kurds have been attempting to build up the Iraqi government, by the Constitution as approved by the people.

These allegations are troubling. We are proceeding entirely in accord with the Iraqi constitution, implementing provisions that were brokered by the U.S.

Kurdistan is what the Middle East will hopefully become. The Kurds are deserving of our support, and I am proud to believe in Kurdistan. In the words of the article:

I am proud that the Kurdistan Region is both a model and gateway for the rest of Iraq. Our difficult path to a secular, federal democracy is very much inspired by the U.S. And so we look forward to working with the Obama-Biden administration to support and defend our hard-fought successes in Iraq, and to remain proud of what the Kurdistan region is today: a thriving civil society in the heart of the Middle East. When we insist on strict compliance with our country’s constitution, we are only following America’s great example.

Cross posted at World Threats and http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2008/11/kurdistan-is-model-for-iraq.html

Technorati Tags: , ,

How Low Will Oil Prices Go?

Posted by Matthew Avitabile

The national average price of gasoline has fallen to $2.22 and the price of a barrel of oil has fallen to near $56.

Now, with the slowing global economy, will oil prices continue to fall? Some factors point to yes: 1. U.S. promises to drill more may flatten oil prices. 2. Increased ethanol production cuts down on gasoline demand. 3. If people don’t have additional money because they’re saving, the less they spend on gas. 4. If you’re unemployed, you’re not commuting to work every day.

But other factors point otherwise: 1. Obama wanting to restrict domestic oil drilling. 2. Cheaper gas prices may encourage people to travel just from the low prices. 3. Saudi Arabia has stated that it doesn’t want oil to fall below $50. A drastic cut in oil production could spike prices. 4. A terrorist threat in the Middle East could cause a price spike.

So, where will oil be in six months? I’d guess around $75 with gas around $2.80.

Also posted at: http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-low-will-oil-prices-go.html

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Recession Is Hurting More Than Our Bank Accounts

Posted by Scott Bannon
Image source: http://www.tages.biz/index.php?module=news&page=readmore&news_id=311

Image source: Tages

It can be easy to lose focus on other things when we’re fighting to pay our light bill, even things as large as the planet… but if I’ve learned one thing from the Presidential elections this year it’s that younger people in our country are engaged and passionate about the future.

The upside to that is that these are the people who know best how to do what we need at this time — multitask!

While we need to address our financial problems, we also need to remain focused on foreign affairs, the war on terror, energy, health care and a wide range of additional, important issues.

If we do need to shift focus anywhere, I suggest we abandon the war on drugs. It’s un-winnable and the fight itself oppressive to our economic growth; so see the abandonment as a positive move towards fixing the economy if you must.

One place we can’t lose focus though, is the environment. In the past few weeks I’ve read several disturbing news reports which suggest that our global economic challenges are now threatening much of the encouraging progress it looked like we were making towards cleaner and renewable energy sources.

Several weeks ago the New York Times reported that European leaders were demanding the trade bloc backpedal on the pledge to cut greenhouse emissions by 20% as well as generate at-least 20% of their power through renewable sources by 2020.

Now I’m hearing that oil man, T. Boone Pickens, is backing off his mega wind project in Texas due to cheaper natural gas options as prices have fallen.

Apparently as long as burning fossil fuels is cheap enough Mr. Pickens doesn’t really care about the planet or future of our children and grandchildren.

While I usually agree with conservatives that a free marketplace and competition will drive innovation and advances, there are areas and times where industry simply needs to be dragged, kicking and screaming, onto the right path. That’s an essential role of a government that’s “for the people” in my opinion.

Shifting energy from fossil fuels to renewables is one of those areas, and this is one of those times.

Unfortunately, as the European leaders displayed it doesn’t look as though there’s enough backbone and will among governments to do the heavy lifting against big energy. And despite the rhetoric, I have serious doubts our President-Elect Obama will be able to do this here in America either once he takes office.

So, what do we do? If people really want to make a change, to protect our future and the future of our children, are we capable of forcing our leaders and corporations to bend to our needs and do the right thing?

I only hope so, because it looks like real progress in fighting climate change is only going to come from we the people.

Technorati Tags: , ,

A Sign of Real Changes to Come?

Posted by Scott Bannon
Change.gov

Change.gov

Thanks to Boing Boing for pointing this out to me. The speed with which this site was put online so that everyone can follow the process of Presidential transition and Obama’s staffing selections would imply that President-elect Obama really does “get it” regarding people’s desire for transparency and candor in our leaders after such an extended period of feeling shut-out.

It may also imply that his use of the Internet and especially social networking online is likely to continue during his time in office.

That would be fantastic on many levels. Imagine the implications of the public being able to easily monitor and discuss the government’s activities without any of the middle-man slanting from large media outlets getting in the way.

I believe it will inspire a more active and ongoing participation in our government and future from all corners.

I’m well aware that many don’t agree with his policy positions, I myself never got behind Barack Obama the candidate–but based on what we’re seeing so far I must admit that he appears to be walking the path that he laid out to us as far as changing how our government operates.

For those of us who work online, Change.gov is what we would call the start of a discussion between those behind the site (our government), and those they’re trying to reach (we the people). That seems like a giant first step towards healing and uniting the country from the divisive politics of old to me. What do you think?

Technorati Tags: ,